
Well no one emailed me with an answer to my question about how you can gain the same advantage by fighting left handed, with your knife still in your right hand. Maybe the question was too difficult, too simple, or no one cared enough to email. I wonder which? (Right after I posted this I found that a reader had posted a good question, thanks) The photo is self-explanatory. (Holy Crap I look like Fidel Castro in this photo. Gwynnes photo is much nicer but same idea. The photos are from our book The Rhythm of One) Some people will say “Oh that is simple, I figured that out.” Some will say, “If you hold your knife that way your arm can be trapped against your body.” This is true if you insist on moving your knife around your body. Try moving your body around the knife for once. Anyway, what brave soul would like to prove that by trapping me? For those of you who are used to training/defending in the dojo without moving your body, this may be a problem.

The advantage I want you to see is that by placing your knife in this posture you move it closer to your opponent’s weapon hand/side. This alters the time-space continuum of the conflict. It also requires that when he cuts or thrusts that you move, you move your entire body not just your arm. Experiment and see where your body ends up as you expand outward from this posture. By the way Gwynne is standing in a mugamae posture (posture of no posture) here and while it looks lke a poor defense you could be very surprised. Remember knife fighting is not static! Too many schools of knife defense operate on the premise that if you have a knife in your hand you do not need to employ all of the other fancy stuff you learned as an empty-hand stylist: things like mobility, fluidity, circular movement, chords, etc, etc. The other salient point to this posture is your right shoulder. Yeh, it’s a big wide-open target isn’t it. Think about that......Well anyway that’s my answer and its up to you to see how it works, or not. I am working on another technique that I may name the Quasimodo. Got the picture?

The advantage I want you to see is that by placing your knife in this posture you move it closer to your opponent’s weapon hand/side. This alters the time-space continuum of the conflict. It also requires that when he cuts or thrusts that you move, you move your entire body not just your arm. Experiment and see where your body ends up as you expand outward from this posture. By the way Gwynne is standing in a mugamae posture (posture of no posture) here and while it looks lke a poor defense you could be very surprised. Remember knife fighting is not static! Too many schools of knife defense operate on the premise that if you have a knife in your hand you do not need to employ all of the other fancy stuff you learned as an empty-hand stylist: things like mobility, fluidity, circular movement, chords, etc, etc. The other salient point to this posture is your right shoulder. Yeh, it’s a big wide-open target isn’t it. Think about that......Well anyway that’s my answer and its up to you to see how it works, or not. I am working on another technique that I may name the Quasimodo. Got the picture?


couple days illustrating the answer.
We had a couple down for supper one night and my wife said “Why don’t you show them your new rifle?” It is a Match Grade Colt AR-15 HBAR. I got it out and laid it on the floor. My friend pointed it out to his wife, and in a rather snotty tone said, “That’s one of those assault rifles I told you about.” He continued on to say, “I don’t know why anyone needs one of those.” You know it really took me by surprise. Black rifles are not for everyone but they are as much a part of our martial heritage as a Kentucky rifle or a Springfield Musket. AR rifles have been around since the Vietnam War and have served a distinguished career for a half century. In fact that basic platform and caliber are now used globally by many NATO nations. What bothered me most about the brief exchange was his insulting opinion being expressed in my own home. Would it have been different if the rifle had been one of my hand-built Pennsylvania long rifles or my Sharps long range express? These were the assault weapons of their day, carried by American soldiers and snipers to kill British troops or Indians. My frosty response was, “I might need one someday for self-defense.” His quick reply was, “Self defense against who?” Maybe he doesn’t watch the news much.
No hope, No change only more corruption Chicago style
For years my handgun of choice was a Colt 1911 pistol manufactured in 1918. Recently that pre-eminence has been challenged by a Smith and Wesson 686 Combat Magnum. It’s a big gun, physically, but it tucks in nicely at my waist. The 357 magnum round provides all of the firepower I feel I need and the luxury and economy of shooting low power 38 special rounds. But what made me suddenly switch from a semi-auto to a wheel-gun? In a word, ergonomics. It was love at first holding. This was the first time I ever picked up a handgun and could not lay it down until I convinced myself to put down a deposit. Yeh it was that good. Just like with a fighting knife it either feels right in your hand or it doesn’t. So like as not, if you meet me out and about, the 686 is probably tucked into my waistband. I can legally carry it concealed even when it is illegal to carry my knife.
No that doesn’t make sense but as a Law Enforcement Officer once told me, “It doesn’t have to make sense, it’s the law.” So when I cannot carry a dagger, bowie, or a tactical folder I legally carry my 357 magnum packing over 500 ft/lbs of muzzle energy. Go figure. Oh yeh and for around the house I have my Red Neck Squirrel rifle loaded with frangible ammo.
